Read the original article here.

---

Digital Manipulation: How Data is Used for Media Manipulation and Control

This resource explores the concept of media manipulation, focusing particularly on how digital platforms and the pervasive use of data have transformed and amplified these tactics. Understanding these mechanisms is crucial in an era where information flows rapidly and continuously influences our perceptions and decisions.

What is Media Manipulation?

Media Manipulation: Refers to orchestrated campaigns in which actors exploit the distinctive features of mass communication channels, including broadcasting, mass communications, or digital media platforms, to mislead, misinform, or create a narrative that advances their specific interests and agendas.

In essence, media manipulation is about deliberately shaping the information landscape to achieve a desired outcome. It's not just about presenting a biased view; it often involves active steps to distort truth, suppress opposing viewpoints, and control the narrative.

Key Elements:

• Orchestrated Campaigns: These are not random occurrences but planned efforts by specific actors (individuals, groups, organizations, governments).
• Exploiting Platform Features: Manipulators understand how different media work – whether it's the rapid spread on social media, the authority of traditional news broadcasts, or the virality of online content.
• Goals: The primary aims are typically to mislead, misinform, or establish a favorable narrative, all in service of the manipulator's interests (political, financial, ideological, etc.).

As noted by Jacques Ellul in Propaganda: The Formation of Men's Attitudes, public opinion relies on channels provided by mass media. In the digital age, these channels are more numerous and complex than ever, making them fertile ground for manipulation.

Where Does Digital Manipulation Occur? (Contexts)

Digital manipulation tactics are not confined to a single domain. They are employed across various spheres of influence, often leveraging digital platforms and user data to maximize their impact.

Activism

Activism: The practice or doctrine emphasizing direct, vigorous action, especially supporting or opposing one side of a controversial matter, typically through social movements.

In the digital age, activism frequently utilizes online platforms. While much digital activism is genuine grassroots effort, manipulation can occur when actors use these channels to create the illusion of widespread support or opposition for a cause. This can involve using bots, fake accounts, or coordinated campaigns to amplify certain messages, distorting the true level of public engagement or sentiment. Data on who supports/opposes what, and where they congregate online, is invaluable for targeting and amplifying manipulative messages within activist communities.

Advertising

Advertising: A form of promotion seeking to persuade a specific audience to purchase a good or service, or to support an idea or cause (non-commercial advertising).

Digital advertising is inherently built on data collection and targeting. While often benign (showing you ads for shoes you looked at), it can be manipulated for deceptive purposes. This includes:

• False Advertising: Misleading claims about products or services amplified through targeted digital ads.
• Targeted Disinformation: Running political or social issue ads containing false or misleading information, specifically targeting demographics identified via data as susceptible to that message.
• Manipulative Visuals: Using heavily edited photos or videos (see techniques below) in advertisements shown to specific user segments identified through data profiling.

Non-commercial advertisers (political campaigns, advocacy groups) also heavily use data-driven digital advertising to spread messages, which can veer into propaganda or disinformation.

Hoaxing

Hoax: Something intended to deceive or defraud; a deceptive trick.

Digital platforms provide unprecedented tools and reach for spreading hoaxes. From fake news stories designed to look real to elaborate online scams, hoaxes thrive on digital virality. Data can be used to identify which types of hoaxes resonate with specific online communities or demographics, allowing manipulators to tailor their deceptive content for maximum spread and impact.

Examples: Fabricated news reports about a major event, fake charity appeals, online chain letters spreading false warnings.

Propagandizing

Propaganda: A form of communication aimed at influencing the attitude of a community toward some cause or position, often by presenting only one side of an argument. While the term can be neutral, it frequently carries a negative connotation due to manipulative historical examples.

Propaganda leverages digital channels extensively. Unlike traditional methods, digital propaganda can be hyper-targeted. Data allows propagandists to understand the beliefs, biases, and values of specific groups within the population and craft messages that appeal directly to those existing beliefs, making them more persuasive and likely to be accepted and shared. Digital platforms enable constant repetition and wide dispersal, fulfilling classic propaganda principles at scale.

Examples: State-sponsored social media campaigns promoting a specific political narrative, online movements using emotionally charged content and simplified slogans to influence public opinion on a social issue.

Psychological Warfare

Psychological Warfare (PSYWAR): Actions taken, often by governments or military forces, aimed at evoking a planned psychological reaction in other people (typically an adversary population or force).

Digital platforms have become a major front in modern psychological warfare. Tactics historically involving leaflets or radio broadcasts now include:

• Targeted Messaging: Sending threatening or misleading messages via text, social media, or targeted ads to civilian populations or opposing forces, often based on data about their location or network connectivity.
• Online Disinformation Campaigns: Spreading false rumors or demoralizing content through social media, forums, and messaging apps to weaken the morale or resolve of a target group.
• Identity Exploitation: Using data to identify individuals or groups susceptible to specific psychological pressures (e.g., economic anxiety, social division) and targeting them with tailored manipulative content.

Examples: Text messages warning civilians in a conflict zone, social media posts designed to sow discord within an enemy's population, online rumors about resource shortages.

Public Relations

Public Relations (PR): The management of the flow of information between an individual or an organization and the public.

While legitimate PR aims to build positive relationships, it can involve manipulative techniques. In the digital space, PR leverages data to:

• Monitor Sentiment: Track online conversations about an organization or individual.
• Control Narrative: Flood digital channels with positive stories to drown out negative ones ("astroturfing" can be a PR tactic).
• Identify Influencers: Find individuals who can be persuaded (or paid) to promote a specific message to their online followers.
• Damage Reputation: Spreading negative (true or false) information about opponents, often anonymously or through proxies, using data to target audiences who would be most receptive to the negative narrative.

How is Digital Manipulation Done? (Techniques)

Digital manipulation employs a range of specific techniques, often overlapping and used in combination. Many of these leverage data and the unique features of online platforms.

Internet Manipulation

These techniques are specifically designed for the online environment and are heavily reliant on understanding and manipulating digital systems and user behavior data.

Internet Manipulation: A broad category encompassing tactics used to influence online information, discussion, and perception, often through deceptive means.

• Astroturfing

  Astroturfing: The deceptive tactic of presenting an orchestrated marketing, public relations, or political campaign as spontaneous, grassroots behavior. It aims to create the false impression of widespread, authentic support for a cause, product, or person.

  • How Data is Used: Data helps identify the platforms and online communities where the target audience is active. It can also inform the creation of fake online personas that blend in with existing users, based on analysis of their online activity and demographics. Automation and data on user behavior allow for the creation and management of numerous fake accounts (bots or sock puppets) designed to mimic real users and amplify messages.
  • Examples: Companies paying people to post fake positive reviews online; political campaigns using networks of fake social media accounts to praise their candidate and attack opponents, making it look like widespread public opinion.

• Clickbait

  Clickbait: Online headlines or content designed primarily to attract clicks, often featuring sensationalized, misleading, or exaggerated claims, sometimes lacking substantive information once clicked.

  • How Data is Used: Data on user clicks, engagement rates, and sharing patterns is fundamental to creating effective clickbait. Manipulators analyze which types of emotional triggers, questions, or sensational topics get the most clicks within specific user groups. Data from browsing history and social media activity helps tailor clickbait headlines to individual users' known interests and biases.
  • Examples: News headlines like "You Won't Believe What This Celebrity Did Next!" or articles with titles designed to appeal to specific political biases ("The Real Reason [Opponent] Wants You To Think [False Claim]"). These can be used to generate ad revenue but also to drive traffic to sites spreading misinformation.

• Information Laundering

  Information Laundering: A method where information of dubious origin or veracity is first published on a less trusted platform, then reported on by more established media outlets as simply a report from the initial source, distancing the established media from the original claim's verification.

  • How Data is Used: Data on media consumption patterns helps manipulators identify fringe platforms that might be picked up by more mainstream outlets. Data on how quickly information spreads and which sources are cited by others helps refine the process. It's about understanding the information flow and finding weak points to inject potentially false narratives that gain legitimacy through subsequent, distanced reporting.
  • Example: A conspiracy theory appears on a fringe blog. A slightly more recognized, but still unreliable, website reports, "According to [fringe blog]...". Then, a less cautious, but somewhat more mainstream, news outlet reports, "Reports indicate that...", referencing the second site. By this point, the original dubious source is obscured, and the claim gains a veneer of credibility.

• Search Engine Marketing (SEM) / Search Engine Optimization (SEO)

  Search Engine Marketing (SEM): The use of paid advertising, search engine optimization (SEO), and other strategies to increase a website's visibility in search engine results pages (SERPs). Search Engine Optimization (SEO): The process of optimizing online content and websites to rank higher in organic (non-paid) search engine results.

  • How Data is Used: SEM/SEO are heavily data-driven. Manipulators use data on search queries, user behavior on websites, click-through rates, and search engine algorithms to make specific content rank higher for relevant searches. This allows them to push misleading or biased information (articles, websites, videos) to the top of search results, making it appear more authoritative or prevalent than it is.
  • Example: An organization wanting to promote a specific political viewpoint might optimize numerous articles using relevant keywords so that when someone searches for information on that topic, the manipulative content appears first, potentially pushing factual information lower in the results.

Distraction Techniques

These methods aim to divert the public's attention away from critical issues or inconvenient truths. In the digital age, distraction is amplified by the constant flow of information and the algorithms that prioritize engagement.

• Distraction by Major Events ("Smoke Screen")

  Distraction by Major Events: The tactic of deliberately drawing public attention to a different, often more sensational or emotionally engaging topic, to divert focus from a less convenient or problematic issue.

  • How Data is Used: Data on trending topics, user interests, and media consumption helps manipulators identify what types of "major events" (real or fabricated) are likely to capture widespread attention and effectively displace other news. Social media algorithms can be exploited (or influenced) to amplify the distracting topic.
  • Example: A government facing a domestic scandal might encourage or amplify news coverage of an unrelated international incident or a culturally divisive topic that dominates online discussion, using data to predict which narrative will gain traction.

• Distracting the Public (Appealing to Nationalism/Fear)

  Distracting the Public (via Nationalism/Fear): A technique that attempts to refute arguments or shift focus by appealing to strong emotions like nationalism or by inspiring fear or hate towards an external group (e.g., a foreign country or foreigners).

  • How Data is Used: Data profiling helps identify individuals or groups most susceptible to nationalistic or fear-based appeals. Manipulators use this data to target these groups with specific messages, memes, and content designed to trigger these emotions and redirect their attention or anger away from the original issue.
  • Example: When questioned about a policy failure, a political actor might pivot to discussing a perceived threat from a foreign power, spreading related content online targeting users identified as highly nationalistic or fearful of outsiders, using data on their online interactions and demographics.

• Straw Man Fallacy

  Straw Man Fallacy: An informal logical fallacy where someone distorts or misrepresents their opponent's argument, then attacks the distorted version (the "straw man") instead of the actual argument, creating the illusion of having refuted the original position.

  • How Data is Used: Data on how specific arguments or policies are discussed online can help manipulators craft simplified, often extreme, distortions of those arguments that are easily shareable and memorable. They can then target these distorted "straw man" arguments to audiences identified via data as likely to accept the simplification and reject the original, nuanced position.
  • Example: If a proposal is made to increase public funding for a service, a manipulator might create social media posts or ads falsely claiming the proposal is about "massive tax hikes to give handouts to undeserving people," targeting users who are fiscally conservative or wary of social programs.

AI and Advanced Digital Techniques

These techniques leverage sophisticated digital tools, often powered by Artificial Intelligence (AI), and require significant computational power and, crucially, large datasets for training.

• Audio Manipulation (Deepfakes)

  Audio Manipulation (Deepfakes): The use of Artificial Intelligence (AI), specifically machine learning models, to generate realistic-sounding artificial audio that replicates a specific person's voice, including pitch, tone, and cadence.

  • How Data is Used: AI models are trained on vast datasets of recorded speech from the target individual. The more high-quality audio data available, the more realistic the generated voice will be. This data allows the AI to learn the unique characteristics of a voice and replicate them convincingly.
  • Example: Creating a fake audio recording of a politician making controversial remarks they never actually made, then releasing it online to discredit them.

• Photo Manipulation

  Photo Manipulation: The alteration of visual media (photographs) using digital editing tools. This can range from simple adjustments (cropping, color correction) to significant changes like adding or removing subjects, or altering features to mislead or deceive.

  • How Data is Used: While traditional photo editing doesn't directly use user data in the editing, data informs how photos are manipulated for persuasion. Data on what visuals are appealing, what features are desirable, or what kinds of visual narratives resonate with specific demographics guides the manipulation process (e.g., altering body shapes in advertising based on beauty standards data, adding elements to a political photo to trigger specific reactions based on audience profiling). The ease of digital sharing (facilitated by data flow) makes manipulated photos powerful tools for spreading misinformation.
  • Example: Altering a photo from a rally to make the crowd look larger or smaller; adding misleading elements to a news photo to change its meaning; heavily editing product photos to conceal flaws.

• Video Manipulation (Deepfakes)

  Video Manipulation (Deepfakes): The creation of fabricated digital videos using advanced techniques, often powered by AI, to replicate the appearance, facial structure, body movements, and voice of a subject, making it appear as if they are doing or saying something they did not. Deepfakes are a prominent example.

  • How Data is Used: Like audio deepfakes, video deepfakes rely on large datasets of video and images of the target individual. This data trains AI models to convincingly superimpose a person's face and likeness onto existing video footage and synchronize it with manipulated audio. The sophistication of the result is directly related to the quality and quantity of the training data.
  • Example: Creating a realistic-looking video of a world leader making a false announcement or a damaging statement; fabricating video evidence of events that never occurred.

The Central Role of Data in Digital Manipulation

The "Digital Manipulation: How They Use Data to Control You" context highlights that data isn't just a side effect; it's often the engine driving modern manipulation.

1. Profiling: Vast amounts of data are collected about individuals' online behavior – what they click, share, search for, where they are, who they connect with, their demographics, stated interests, inferred beliefs, and emotional states. This data allows manipulators to build detailed profiles of users.
2. Targeting: These profiles enable microtargeting. Instead of sending the same manipulative message to everyone, manipulators can tailor specific messages (ads, fake news, propaganda) to individuals or small groups identified via data as being most susceptible, influential within a specific network, or relevant to the campaign's goals.
3. Message Testing and Optimization: Data allows manipulators to test different versions of a manipulative message (A/B testing) on small groups to see which is most effective (gets more clicks, shares, or desired reactions) before deploying the most successful version widely.
4. Amplification: Data helps identify key online influencers, susceptible networks, or optimal times/platforms for spreading manipulative content. It can also be used to manage networks of bots or fake accounts to maximize the perceived reach and popularity of a message.
5. Tracking Effectiveness: Data allows manipulators to monitor the impact of their campaigns in near real-time, seeing who is interacting with the content, what the sentiment is, and how the narrative is spreading, allowing for rapid adjustments.

In essence, data transforms manipulation from a blunt instrument (mass propaganda) into a precision tool (microtargeted influence). By understanding individuals' online habits, biases, and vulnerabilities, manipulators can deliver highly personalized and persuasive content designed to subtly (or overtly) shift attitudes and behaviors, often without the target even realizing they are being manipulated.

Impact and Consequences

The widespread use of digital manipulation, powered by data, has significant consequences:

• Erosion of Trust: As it becomes harder to distinguish real information from fake, trust in media, institutions, and even fellow citizens diminishes.
• Polarization: Manipulation often thrives on exploiting and widening societal divisions by targeting groups with tailored, divisive content.
• Undermining Democracy: The ability to spread disinformation and manipulate public opinion, particularly during elections or on political issues, poses a direct threat to democratic processes.
• Damage to Individuals and Groups: Reputations can be destroyed by fabricated content (deepfakes), and individuals can be targeted with harassment or scams based on their data profiles.
• Distorted Reality: A constant barrage of manipulated content can create a distorted understanding of reality, making informed decision-making difficult for individuals and society as a whole.

Understanding the techniques of media manipulation and, critically, the central role that data plays in enabling these techniques in the digital age, is the first step in recognizing and potentially countering these powerful forces seeking to control narratives and influence behavior.